Our services
Support for growth strategies, transformations or M&A processes.
Our freelance experts have in-depth specialist knowledge in their field.
We provide you with experienced interim managers who take on responsibility.
Customized expert teams for complex projects
We find the best experts for these companies
Private equity
Efficient support throughout the deal cycle
Management consultancies
Flexible resources for demanding projects
Medium sized business
Consulting expertise for SMEs
Corporates
Technical and management experts for operational excellence
Scale-ups
Strategic & operational support for growth
Function, Not Placement

Where HR Consulting Helps — and Where It Has No Mandate

Advisory conversation on the setup of an HR function in front of an overview of roles and responsibilities

HR consulting — human resources consulting is the longer name for the same discipline — is aimed at the HR function of a company, not at filling individual positions. That is exactly what separates it from recruitment consulting, which searches for and places people in open roles. If you want to understand where HR work usually comes apart, do not look at the org chart, look at the clock: every HR department runs three time horizons at once, and they always slip in the same direction.

The daily horizon is always loud. Contracts, payroll, sick notes, certificates, an open position, a conflict inside a team. This work has a sender, a deadline and somebody who follows up — and it fills the calendar completely without anyone ever having decided that it should.

The annual horizon can be planned, but it can also be traded away. Target agreements, the pay round, the training budget, backfilling roles, the figures the management board asks for. It is in the calendar, and it moves as soon as the daily horizon grows — noticeable only when the same measure slides into the next quarter for the third time.

The multi-year horizon has no sender at all. Age structure, skill profiles, the next generation of leaders, the question of whether today's split of responsibilities will still fit in five years. Nobody chases it. By the time it becomes visible it is usually already a gap: a position for which nobody inside the company was prepared. Outside support is therefore mostly not an injection of knowledge but an injection of time at precisely this point — somebody works on the horizon that everyday business reliably pushes aside.

What HR consulting does not do. It does not fill positions and it does not run the search for candidates. It can propose who should be responsible for what, but it cannot hand out that responsibility — who decides what in future stays a leadership decision of the house. And it does not replace a review under employment and co-determination law: questions on works agreements, collective bargaining coverage or equal pay we can frame, but the binding review of the individual case belongs with a qualified body.

Starting Points

When Outside Support in HR Work Is Worth the Effort

Not every people question needs help from outside. Where the HR function is properly staffed and the annual plan still has room, the internal route is faster and cheaper. In the situations below the arithmetic usually tips — not because knowledge about the company is missing, but because the task comes up in-house every few years at most, so no routine can build up around it.

1. The HR Function Has to Be Redrawn

  • Employee support, specialist topics and administration have grown into a split that nobody actively chose.
  • Whoever owns that split is poorly placed to question it — and has to keep it running at the same time.

2. An HR System Is Being Selected or Replaced

  • Pay, time recording, recruiting and development sit in separate tools, and the same data is maintained several times over.
  • Errors in data migration and payroll runs only surface in live operation, and then they hit everyone at once.

3. The Pay Structure Can No Longer Be Explained

  • Salaries have come about through single decisions; a shared logic behind them is missing.
  • Without a system anyone can follow, every adjustment becomes a special case — and every answer becomes a negotiation.

4. Key Positions Stay Vacant or Fall Vacant

  • The same functions are open for long periods again and again, or several experienced people leave within the same window.
  • The bottleneck often sits not in the labor market but in the missing preparation for departures that were foreseeable.

5. A Reorganization Changes the Structure

  • An acquisition, a carve-out or a new cut of business units brings different rule sets and systems together.
  • The longer two HR worlds run in parallel, the harder the merge becomes.

6. Leadership Work Is the Bottleneck

  • Strong specialists have moved into leadership roles without anyone settling what the role actually demands.
  • A single seminar changes little; what works is the work on the decisions that are already pending.

Do you recognize your own situation in one of these descriptions? Twenty minutes are enough for a first placement: which figures should be on the table first, which project goes ahead of the others — and whether anyone from outside is needed for it at all.

Practice Areas

What Human Resources Consulting Actually Works On

We take on the practice areas below on their own or in combination, depending on what a project hangs on. It is an excerpt: in many projects two or three areas interlock — a new pay system without a clean job logic underneath stays a spreadsheet without a foundation.

HR Strategy and Target Picture for the People Function

What HR work is expected to deliver over the coming years and how it has to be set up for that: the split of tasks between employee support, specialist topics and administration, decision rights, interfaces into the business units. Part of it is a baseline of your own figures and a ranking that still holds when the budget is cut.

Organizational Development and Organizational Design

The cut of units, roles and reporting lines — and the question of which decision falls where in future. Organizational development starts at structures here, not at methods: a unit whose result depends on three approvals outside itself does not get faster through any way of working.

People Development and Competency Models

Which capabilities the business will demand, which ones exist today and how the gap gets closed. A competency model that carries is short, tied to real tasks and connected to offers that take place inside everyday work — leadership development included.

Compensation, Benefits and Pay Systems

A system that can be explained: job evaluation, pay bands, variable components and benefits in a relationship anyone can follow. The value lies less in the level than in being able to justify it. Collective bargaining and co-determination obligations we can frame; reviewing them stays with the house.

HR Digitalization and HR Systems

Selection, replacement and interplay of the tools for pay, time, recruiting and development — vendor-neutral, with no license interest of our own. Before any rollout comes the clearing-up: a process with five exceptions does not get shorter in digital form, it gets harder to maintain. Where a project reaches into the wider system landscape, we work alongside digital transformation consulting.

Workforce Planning and Headcount Planning

How many people with which capabilities are needed where — derived from sales, capacity and age data instead of from last year plus a percentage. Workforce planning becomes a calculation with several scenarios and named assumptions, and it can be adjusted the moment one of those assumptions tips.

Which of these areas has to bite first in your case can be narrowed down in a short conversation. Describe the starting position — what you get back is an assessment, not a deck.

Modes of Support

Four Ways an HR Mandate Can Be Set Up

The result often depends less on depth of expertise than on the shape of the engagement: how much outside capacity, under which mandate, over which period. Our network covers four ways of working, and moving from one to another during a project is the normal case. The same frame applies to all four: a named internal owner, goals agreed in writing before the start, and a handover point that is fixed at the beginning.

Outside View
Second Opinion

One experienced person examines a clearly bounded question: the logic behind the pay structure, the cut of the HR function, the requirements list ahead of a system selection. Two to six weeks, often part time — useful where the only thing missing is experience with this kind of decision.

Joint Delivery
Specialist Reinforcement

One to three specialists work in a team with your own people, under internal professional lead. The most common form in system replacements, pay projects and competency models, typically three to nine months. The advantage lies in the handover: the knowledge stays in the house because it is created there.

Temporary Ownership
Interim Responsibility for HR

An external person leads the HR function or part of it with decision authority — during a vacancy, in a rebuild, or where an instance is needed that does not sit inside the internal interests. Usually six to eighteen months, with a handover date agreed at the start.

Regular Sounding Board
Sparring for the Head of HR

A few days a month for the person who owns the function: talking through pending decisions, sharpening the papers that go to the management board. Professional counter-argument from somebody who has lived through the same situation more than once.

Sector Dynamics

HR Topics by Industry: What Sets the Pace There

HR work is the same discipline in every industry and the same task in none of them. What sets the pace is different each time: in production it is the shift model and the age structure at the machines, in care it is the duty roster and the legally bound staffing level, in retail the turnover across the branch network, in the financial sector the duty of evidence that reaches into pay itself, in technology the speed at which skill profiles age, and in public administration collective bargaining coverage together with the establishment plan. Those differences decide which measure can be implemented at all — a pay model that works in a software house cannot be applied in the public sector. That is why we staff with specialists who have worked in the respective environment, drawing on a network of 25 functional areas with more than 300 role profiles. Each tile names what it hangs on there.

HR work in industry and mechanical engineering: managers in conversation on a production floor

Industry & Mechanical Engineering

HR work in healthcare: a hospital team in a joint duty-roster meeting

Healthcare & Nursing

HR work in retail: an employee records stock with a tablet in a store

Retail & Consumer Goods

HR work at banks and insurers: two specialists review evaluations on screens

Banking & Insurance

HR work in technology companies: a team in an open-plan office in joint discussion

Technology & Software

HR work in public administration: employees in conversation in front of an administrative building

Public Administration

HR work in industry and mechanical engineering: managers in conversation on a production floor

Industry & Mechanical Engineering

HR work in healthcare: a hospital team in a joint duty-roster meeting

Healthcare & Nursing

HR work in retail: an employee records stock with a tablet in a store

Retail & Consumer Goods

HR work at banks and insurers: two specialists review evaluations on screens

Banking & Insurance

HR work in technology companies: a team in an open-plan office in joint discussion

Technology & Software

HR work in public administration: employees in conversation in front of an administrative building

Public Administration

Assignment Patterns

How the Success of an HR Project Becomes Readable

What actually gets commissioned in HR work falls for the most part into a small number of types. Each has a typical starting position and a target figure that is agreed before the start and measured while the work runs — not estimated at the end.

Re-Cutting the HR Function

Starting position: employee support, specialist topics and administration are mixed, and the same question is answered in three places. What has proven itself: first record how much time actually flows where, then cut tasks and decision rights anew, and only then talk about positions. The measure is the administrative share of working time and the processing time for standard requests.

Introducing or Replacing an HR System

Starting position: tools for pay, time and recruiting that have simply grown, data maintained several times over, a vendor announcing the end of maintenance. What has proven itself: clean up processes and master data before the selection, derive requirements from the target process, roll out in waves. The measure is the manual rework per payroll run.

Building a Competency and Development Model

Starting position: training takes place, but nobody can say what it pays into; development conversations run without a shared yardstick. The route goes through a few capabilities tied to real tasks rather than through a comprehensive catalog. The measure is the coverage of critical qualifications and how many development agreements have been carried out a year later.

Rebuilding the Compensation System

Starting position: salaries have come about case by case, comparable positions sit far apart, and every adjustment produces follow-up requests. It only becomes solid with a job evaluation from which the bands are derived. The measure is the spread within comparable positions. Collective bargaining and co-determination obligations are to be settled beforehand.

Profile Types

From Payroll to Organizational Development: Profiles We Place

The bottleneck decides which profile an HR project needs, and it moves as soon as the first stage holds. The profiles below are the ones we place most often in people and organization projects; they stand as examples for a wider field that is reachable through the category pages.

How a Project Inside the HR Function Runs

Scope and duration of the steps depend on size, number of sites and system landscape; the sequence does not: first know your own figures, then decide, then build, then hand over. No step is skipped.

Step 1 in an HR project: taking stock of the HR function

1. Take Stock of the HR Function

Two to four weeks: the split of tasks, the systems, the figures and the responsibilities are recorded — against what actually runs, not against the org chart.
Conversations with HR business partners, payroll and unit heads make the workarounds visible that appear in no report.
The result is a picture of the starting point with named bottlenecks and figures behind them — not a maturity grade.
Step 2 in an HR project: target picture and ranking

2. Target Picture and Ranking

What comes first, what comes later, what deliberately does not come at all — per item with effort, expected effect and dependencies, documented openly.
The ranking is cut so that the first steps deliver a benefit on their own, even if the budget is cut later.
Step 3 in an HR project: structure and role model

3. Structure and Role Model

Tasks, decision rights and interfaces are settled before anyone talks about positions or tools.
Points subject to co-determination are marked early so that the agreement does not become the bottleneck at the end.
Step 4 in an HR project: rolling out in one area

4. Roll Out in One Area

The rebuild starts in one bounded area with real cases, not in a model process.
After the first run it is adjusted — what does not hold here will certainly not hold at scale.
Step 5 in an HR project: systems, data and metrics

5. Systems, Data and Metrics

Only once the target flow stands are tools selected or adjusted — not the other way round.
The figures from the stocktaking are carried forward so that progress stays comparable.
Step 6 in an HR project: handover into regular operations

6. Handover Into Regular Operations

Responsibilities, upkeep processes and recurring dates are handed over in writing, not hinted at verbally.
The baseline measurement is repeated — with the same definitions, otherwise the comparison is worthless.
What It Costs

Daily Rates in HR Consulting: What an Interim HR Manager and Specialists on Demand Cost

Two quantities determine the budget of an HR project: the daily rate and the number of days on assignment. The second is the larger one and is nonetheless planned less often. Through our network the work is billed by daily rate — no project lump sum, no success-based components, and no placement fee calculated on an annual salary the way recruitment charges it.

What moves the rate. First seniority and the reach of the mandate: whoever leads an HR function with decision authority sits clearly above a role that supports on specialist questions. Then company size — group structures with several legal entities and sites demand experience that narrows the circle of available people — and the industry, where rule books reach into HR work. The remote share pulls in both directions: pay, data and systems work runs largely independent of location, while committee work and work across a branch network demand presence. Finally the duration: an assignment over twelve months sits below a four-week assignment on a per-day basis.

The ranges of our own portfolio, as they are published on the role pages. Operational HR work — employee support, payroll, system upkeep — sits at €550 to €1,000 per day (Freelance HR Specialist, Freelance HR Generalist, Freelance Payroll Manager). Specialists for development, compensation, workforce planning and figures sit at €750 to €1,300 (Freelance Human Resources Developer, Freelance Compensation & Benefits Specialist, Freelance HR Analytics Manager, Freelance Organizational Developer). Work on HR systems is carried at €900 to €1,400 (Freelance HRIS Specialist, Freelance HR Digital Transformation Consultant). Change, culture and leadership work sits at €700 to €1,400 (Freelance Change Management Consultant, Freelance Leadership Development Consultant, Freelance Corporate Culture Consultant). Leadership responsibility on loan sits above that, at €800 to €2,200 (Interim HR Manager, Freelance HR Transformation Consultant, Interim Human Resources Manager). Each band is a corridor, not a fixed price; the rate for one specific assignment is settled before the engagement starts.

Budget section by section instead of in one sum. Each section ends with a decision, and that decision is allowed to be "no further". Whoever releases everything at once loses exactly the points at which stopping would still have been cheap.

Two demarcations to close. Against a classic consulting firm it is less the rate that differs than the object: there you buy a team that is already formed, with its own methodology; here you buy a single role inside your line organization — with the consequence that the experience gained stays in the house. Against recruitment the difference is more fundamental: there a permanent employment relationship comes about, paid for through a fee on the annual salary. Here a bounded amount of working time is bought for a project, billed by the day, and the mandate ends with the handover. License and running costs of the HR systems are not part of the daily rate.

Staffing follows the cut of the mandate: a second opinion on the pay structure needs a different profile than the replacement of an HR system. The complete overview sits under HR & Recruiting — among them Interim Human Resources Manager, Freelance Organizational Developer, compensation and benefits specialists and works council consultants. For rebuilds that reach beyond the HR function, Transformation & Change Management and Strategy & Management Consulting add to that. Where the question is about processes running between business units, process consulting is the entry point.

Workforce Shift

The Workforce Is Aging Faster Than Successors Are Being Prepared

26.9%

of the labor force in Germany was 55 or older in 2025 — ten years earlier the share was 20.7%. The age structure is not a forecast, it is already on the payroll.
Federal Statistical Office, demographic change

2.4 to 1.7

million: in 2025 there were 2.4 million people in the labor force aged 60 to 64 against 1.7 million aged 20 to 24. Backfilling is arithmetic before it is a search.
Federal Statistical Office, demographic change

3.2 million

fewer people in the labor force by the mid-2030s even under high net migration; under low net migration the projection is 4.9 million.
Federal Statistical Office, population projection
Questions from Practice

Frequently Asked Questions About HR Consulting

HR consulting — also called human resources consulting — helps companies set up and develop their HR function. That includes HR strategy and the cut of the function, organizational development, people development and competency models, compensation, the selection of HR systems, and workforce and succession planning. It works on structures, processes and figures, not on filling individual positions.
Recruitment consulting searches for and places people for open positions, often for leadership roles, and is paid through a fee calculated on the annual salary. HR consulting works on the HR function itself: strategy, organization, development, compensation, systems and planning. The two are frequently confused because both carry the word "personnel" in German.
Billing runs on a daily-rate basis. The ranges published on our role pages run from €550 for operational HR work up to €2,200 for leading an HR function on loan. The budget, however, comes less from the rate than from the number of days on assignment: a second opinion a few days, a specialist project two to three days a week over months, an interim mandate close to full presence.
For an Interim HR Manager our role page publishes €800 to €1,300 per day; for leading a larger HR function as Interim Human Resources Manager the range is €1,400 to €2,200. Where a specific profile sits inside that is decided by the reach of the mandate, company size, industry experience, the share of on-site presence and the duration. A daily rate is an offer price, not a salary divided by working days.
People development covers everything a company does to build the capabilities of its workforce on purpose: qualification, development paths, leadership development and preparation for tasks that are still ahead. Outside support pays off above all when a competency model is built for the first time, and then when training does take place but nobody can say what it pays into.
Organizational development changes the structure, the roles and the decision paths of a company; it asks where which decision falls and whether the structure reflects the actual value creation. HR work supplies a large part of the tools for that. In practice the two can hardly be separated: a new cut of units stays without consequence as long as incentives and responsibilities remain unchanged.
An HR transformation realigns the HR function — usually in four parts: the cut of tasks between employee support, specialist topics and administration; the replacement of the systems; the build-up of figures that hold; and the clarification of which services the business units may expect. The rebuild rarely fails on the technology, more often on the fact that the old split of tasks keeps running informally.
Employer branding makes visible what a company stands for as an employer, and it acts on incoming applications as much as on retention. It only takes effect, however, where the promise survives contact with the lived reality — a campaign that leans on development opportunities while no development paths exist inside raises above all the turnover in the first year.
You can rely on us

Excellent. We are not the only ones who think so.

consultingheads has received several awards from leading trade magazines and independent third parties.

Siegel_TOP-Berater
consultingheads-award-top-company-2025-kununu
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2025-1
consultingheads-kununu-top-company-2024
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2024-3
consultingheads-kununu-top-company-2023 (1)
consultingheads-kununu-top-company-2023 (1)
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2019-1
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2021
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2020
BrandEins_Berater2026_Logo_DE_basic
Siegel_TOP-Berater
consultingheads-award-top-company-2025-kununu
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2025-1
consultingheads-kununu-top-company-2024
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2024-3
consultingheads-kununu-top-company-2023 (1)
consultingheads-kununu-top-company-2023 (1)
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2019-1
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2021
consultingheads-brand-eins-beste-berater-2020
BrandEins_Berater2026_Logo_DE_basic
bildmarke
brand eins Best Management Consultants 2026 — consultingheads
What Happens Next

Let's talk about your HR organization.

A sorted view of your HR question
One concrete next step, not a presentation
No cost, and no obligation to take anything further
Describe briefly what HR work is currently hanging on. We will tell you which figure should be on the table first, what follows from it — and whether we are needed for it at all.